Post by ehsanulh125 on Jan 9, 2024 2:00:07 GMT -5
The essence of these economic psychological observations is that people's decisions can be changed in such a way that the decision-making situation does not change in substance, only its formulation or presentation. These results clearly necessitated the researches that try to counterbalance these problems and at the same time find solutions to them. How can people be protected from being influenced by these tools? In general, it is an interesting result that it does not help significantly if they talk about them or give lectures on the topic specifically for educational purposes (for example, Gächter et al., 2009). Therefore, some other form must be invented and experimented with.
This may end up being just as simple a solution Buy Bulk SMS Service and gimmick as the influence methods themselves. Take, for example, the decoy effect (Huber et al., 1982), the essence of which is that with an extra decoy product we achieve such an effect that the target product seems much better. This is often called the context effect, because with this new bait product, the products are placed in a different context and thus one option may seem better or even worse (examples: Bakó et al., 2018; Bakó and Neszveda, 2020; Dezső et al., 2022). These effects have already been studied from many aspects, but a very big question is how to reduce their effects. Connolly et al. (2013) investigated whether adding a simple piece of information might reduce the strength of the baiting effect and thereby protect people from this type of influence. Let's look at a concrete example of this! Imagine that you searched for a very long time among job opportunities and finally managed to narrow down the job offers to 3! He evaluated them based on the interestingness of the work (on a scale of 0-100) and the possibility of advancement (on a scale of 0-50).
This leaves the following three options: Interestingness 83/100, possibility of advancement 34/50 Interestingness 74/100, possibility of advancement 43/50 Interestingness 71/100, possibility of advancement 43/50 Have you imagined which one you would choose? If you have decided, then imagine yourself in the same situation again, but which of the following 3 options would you choose now? Interestingness 83/100, possibility of advancement 34/50 Interestingness 74/100, possibility of advancement 43/50 Interestingness 80/100, possibility of advancement 34/50 Decide again! Of course, in a real experimental situation, they do not see both questions.
This may end up being just as simple a solution Buy Bulk SMS Service and gimmick as the influence methods themselves. Take, for example, the decoy effect (Huber et al., 1982), the essence of which is that with an extra decoy product we achieve such an effect that the target product seems much better. This is often called the context effect, because with this new bait product, the products are placed in a different context and thus one option may seem better or even worse (examples: Bakó et al., 2018; Bakó and Neszveda, 2020; Dezső et al., 2022). These effects have already been studied from many aspects, but a very big question is how to reduce their effects. Connolly et al. (2013) investigated whether adding a simple piece of information might reduce the strength of the baiting effect and thereby protect people from this type of influence. Let's look at a concrete example of this! Imagine that you searched for a very long time among job opportunities and finally managed to narrow down the job offers to 3! He evaluated them based on the interestingness of the work (on a scale of 0-100) and the possibility of advancement (on a scale of 0-50).
This leaves the following three options: Interestingness 83/100, possibility of advancement 34/50 Interestingness 74/100, possibility of advancement 43/50 Interestingness 71/100, possibility of advancement 43/50 Have you imagined which one you would choose? If you have decided, then imagine yourself in the same situation again, but which of the following 3 options would you choose now? Interestingness 83/100, possibility of advancement 34/50 Interestingness 74/100, possibility of advancement 43/50 Interestingness 80/100, possibility of advancement 34/50 Decide again! Of course, in a real experimental situation, they do not see both questions.